🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure version of the president. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show released last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. While he is called a different name, the message is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a casting call with no shortage of candidates. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state de facto.

• His list featured various figures, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the process said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of him as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. His harder interpretation prompted Russian media and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star popular with Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. His influence is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.